Twitter's NPR saga demonstrates the challenge of labeling media.

Key Highlights :

1. Twitter has reclassified National Public Radio (NPR) as "government-funded media."

2. This decision has sparked backlash from politicians and journalists.

3. The labels "state-affiliated media" and "government-funded media" are misleading and do not reflect the editorial independence of public interest media.

4. Labeling independent public interest media as state-affiliated has negative consequences for their safety and credibility.

     Twitter’s decision to label National Public Radio (NPR) as “state-affiliated media,” which it then changed to “government-funded media” after a barrage of criticism, underscores the need to rethink the role of major social media platforms as critical gatekeepers in the public sphere.

     Twitter’s original label not only failed to accurately reflect the financial support that NPR receives from the government, but it also did not reflect the fact that NPR is an independent media organization that is funded by member donations and the sale of advertising.

     Twitter’s decision to label NPR as “state-affiliated media” was a mistake that should not have been made. The label not only failed to accurately reflect the financial support that NPR receives from the government, but it also did not reflect the fact that NPR is an independent media organization that is funded by member donations and the sale of advertising.

     Twitter should re-evaluate the way it labels news media organizations in order to ensure that all organizations are accurately represented. The decision by Twitter to label National Public Radio (NPR) as “state-affiliated media,” which it then changed to “government-funded media” after a barrage of criticism, underscores the need for better labels for news media.

Continue Reading at Source : brookings